BUSTER User Manual previous next
Appendix B

Appendix B: Real space distributions in BUSTER

Copyright © 1995-2004 by   Eric Blanc, Pietro Roversi, Clemens Vonrhein,
Gérard Bricogne and the Buster Development Group.
All rights reserved.


Content


Introduction

In this document we have a closer look on how does BUSTER compute real-space distributions for the bulk solvent and missing atoms; these distributions are obtained by:
  1. based on an atomic model, computing binary envelopes that are then blurred;
  2. based on an electron density and its local rmsd, computing a Fermi-Dirac envelope.

Both procedures are detailed in the paper quoted below.


Model Based distributions

  1. Binary masks

    The binary envelopes are obtained by masking with a specified radius around the atomic model in the appropriate PDB file. First, the logical union of solid spheres of a given radius centred on each atom in that file is taken, to generate a binary mask around the molecular object. This binary mask is then symmetry expanded to the whole cell.

    The tracing of the binary envelopes is done via calls to the CCP4 program ncsmask. The symmetry expansion is done internally in BUSTER. All binary masks are written to disk as CCP4 formatted maps (and are removed once the blurring has taken place).

    Table 1. Radii and PDB models used in the generation of the binary masks.

    PDB Model Masking radius parameter name
    (default radius)
    Binary mask Symmetry expanded mask
    PDBFRG.dat FRGRAD (2 Å) frgmsk xpnfrgmsk
    BABSLV BLKRAD (2 Å) babslvmsk xpnbabslvmsk
    PDBNUP.dat MSKRAD (4 Å) nupmsk xpnnupmsk

    Note: if no PDBNUP.dat file is specified, the prior mask will just be the complement of the fragment mask (uniform prior).

  2. Blurring of the binary masks

    The generation of the continuous distributions from the symmetry-expanded binary masks listed above proceeds as follows:

    Table 2. Binary masks and blurring factors used in the generation of the continuous distributions.

    Symmetry expanded binary mask Blurring factor parameter name
    (default value)
    Distribution
    xpnbabslvmsk BLKBLR (50) babslv
    priormsk =
    xpnnupmsk BUT NOT xpnfrgmsk
    MSKBLR (150) prior


Guidelines for choosing the various mask radii

  1. FRGRAD

    The fragment mask radius FRGRAD should be chosen so as to produce the correct mean electron density within that binary mask, e.g. about 0.42-0.425 eÅ-3 for a protein. You can check the value of the density within the binary mask for the fragment in the file rhofrg.html, present in the shell.01 directory.

    If FRGRAD is chosen incorrectly, the exclusion of random atoms and solvent will be either insufficient or excessive, and this will imbalance the refinement and/or completion, resulting in artefacts near the fragment boundary. The default value of 2.0 Å seems adequate for proteins (we thank Dirk Kostrewa for communicating the results of his careful estimation of this optimal radius). We are not aware of equivalent results for nucleic acids.

  2. BLKRAD and MSKRAD

    The flexibility in the choice of separate radii BLKRAD and MSKRAD for the other two masks is intended to address two main classes of situations:

    1. If the missing structure is essentially globular, i.e. if completion is expected to bring up detail within a compact domain rather than mostly on the surface, then use BLKRAD = FRGRAD and MSKRAD = FRGRAD, i.e. set all radii to 2.0 Å. This may result in the location and boundary details of the missing region (as specified in the *.pdbnup file and usually of a rather tentative nature) being taken rather too literally. However, these details get attenuated by blurring, and this is not such a serious problem since one is interested mostly in volume detail.

    2. If the missing structure is mostly near the surface of the whole molecule (e.g. surface loops, side chains to improve upon a poly-Ala model), and may even surround it (e.g. missing bound solvent molecules), then it is preferable to take MSKRAD > FRGRAD, e.g. MSKRAD = 3 or 4 Å. In this way, the prior will give the desired room for the missing structure to appear where it is expected.

      If we then choose BLKRAD = FRGRAD, the mean electron density in the whole molecule will have the correct value. The fact that the region on the surface of the whole molecule will receive overlapping contributions from missing atoms and from solvent should not be of too much concern, especially after 10 Å resolution.


Map Based distributions

See the paper below.

References


Last modification: 26.01.04