[buster-discuss] Refining hydrogen atoms
Wei-Chun Kao
wei-chun.kao at biochemie.uni-freiburg.de
Fri Jan 7 09:08:19 CET 2022
Dear Clemens,
since the 20210716 snapshot update of BUSTER, the -M HydrogenHybridModel
option becomes available, so I would like to update some of my previous questions as well.
> On 18. Mar 2021, at 11:04, Clemens Vonrhein <vonrhein at GLOBALPHASING.COM> wrote:
>
> Dear Wei-Chun,
> One thing to remember after a BUSTER refinement including hydrogens:
> during model validation you might need to tell programs to keep the
> hydrogens as they are and to use the correct (ideal) hydrogen
> position. E.g.
>
> molprobity.molprobity keep_hydrogens=True nuclear=False refine.pdb
>
> if you used the full occupancy, e-cloud model.
In case I have high resolution X-ray data, I use
aB_hydrogenate -full
to place hydrogen atoms and refine the coordinates with
-M HydrogenHybridModel
Because the hydrogen atoms are refined with full occupancy and are at
nuclear position, I think there is no need to use
nuclear=False
but keep_hydrogens=True
right? The validation results from buster-report, molprobity.molprobity
and the wwPDB validation server should be consistent I suppose?
>> Will the
>> zero-occupancy hydrogens still improve the geometry of the model at
>> this resolution?
>
> Yes: they are fully visible to the geometry term and therefore also to
> the contact term - resulting in better placement of e.g. side-chain
> rotamers etc.
For moderate-resolution data, I first use aB_hydrogenate to add H-atoms
at zero occupancy and refine the coordinates with BUSTER. If I understood correctly,
buster-report will first run aB_fix_h_occ to synchronize the occupancy of
H-atoms from zero to that of the parent atom. If zero-occupancy H-atoms are invisible to
MolProbity (or some of the molprobity executables), how should I use the BUSTER-refined
coordinates for wwPDB validation since similar issues will likely be encountered?
Best,
Wei-Chun
>> The BUSTER version is snapshot_20210224, the operating system is CentOS 7.
>
> Good.
>
> If there are further questions regarding BUSTER and hydrogens, please
> let us know!
>
> Cheers
>
> Clemens
>
> [1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pro.3330
> [2] https://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2018/08/00/mn5114/mn5114fig8.html
> [3] https://www.globalphasing.com/buster/wiki/index.cgi?BusterRvalues
>
> --
>
> *--------------------------------------------------------------
> * Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
> * Global Phasing Ltd., Sheraton House, Castle Park
> * Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK www.globalphasing.com
> *———————————————————————————————
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.globalphasing.com/pipermail/buster-discuss/attachments/20220107/3e1c0b76/attachment.html>
More information about the buster-discuss
mailing list