<div dir="auto"><div>Dear Italo<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I believe this thread answers your question:</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="http://www.globalphasing.com/pipermail/buster-discuss/2012-June/000157.html">http://www.globalphasing.com/pipermail/buster-discuss/2012-June/000157.html</a><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Cheers</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-- Ian</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, 16:33 Ítalo Augusto Cavini, <<a href="mailto:italo.cavini@usp.br">italo.cavini@usp.br</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Dear all,<div><br></div><div>I am
in the deposition process and I am having considerable differences in R-factors calculated by DCC compared with Buster values. For one structure processed at 1.35 A, in Buster we have R=0.224 and Rfree=0.248 but in the validation report DCC gives R=0.233 Rfree=0.263. And the same does not happen for structures refined with other refinement tools, Phenix.refine for example.</div><div><br></div><div>By the way, I am using wwPDB OneDep System and PDB_Extract for validation and I am going straight from Buster output to wwPDB OneDep (no model changes).</div><div><br></div><div>Has anyone ever experienced something similar?</div><div>Any insights about how solving this problem are appreciated.</div><div><br></div><div>Stay safe,</div><div>Italo Cavini</div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
buster-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:buster-discuss@globalphasing.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">buster-discuss@globalphasing.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.globalphasing.com/mailman/listinfo/buster-discuss" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.globalphasing.com/mailman/listinfo/buster-discuss</a></blockquote></div></div></div>