[sharp-discuss] SnB question
Clemens Vonrhein
vonrhein@globalphasing.com
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:34:53 +0000
Tommy,
I'm not sure if you already found an answer somewhere in the SnB docs
(do they have a discussion board?). I've never used it myself - but I
would be rather surprised if the solution wasn't
self-consistent. Don't know about handedness though ...
Cheers
Clemens
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:03:06PM +0800, Tommy Wang wrote:
> Does anyone know whether the set of heavy atom positions solved by SnB
> are self-consistent in terms of origin shifts and handedness? Or are they
> just one of the solutions that satisfy the Patterson function?
>
> Thanks
> Tommy
>
> _______________________________________________
> sharp-discuss mailing list
> sharp-discuss@globalphasing.com
> http://www.globalphasing.com/mailman/listinfo/sharp-discuss
--
***************************************************************
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein@GlobalPhasing.com
*
* Global Phasing Ltd.
* Sheraton House, Castle Park Tel: +44-(0)1223-353033
* Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK Fax: +44-(0)1223-366889
*--------------------------------------------------------------
* BUSTER Development Group (http://www.globalphasing.com)
***************************************************************