[sharp-discuss] SnB question

[Clemens Vonrhein]

Tommy,

I'm not sure if you already found an answer somewhere in the SnB docs
(do they have a discussion board?). I've never used it myself - but I
would be rather surprised if the solution wasn't
self-consistent. Don't know about handedness though ...

Cheers

Clemens

On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:03:06PM +0800, Tommy Wang wrote:
> Does anyone know whether the set of heavy atom positions solved by SnB 
> are self-consistent in terms of origin shifts and handedness? Or are they 
> just one of the solutions that satisfy the Patterson function?
> 
> Thanks
> Tommy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sharp-discuss mailing list
> sharp-discuss@globalphasing.com
> http://www.globalphasing.com/mailman/listinfo/sharp-discuss

-- 

***************************************************************
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D.          vonrhein@GlobalPhasing.com
*
*  Global Phasing Ltd.
*  Sheraton House, Castle Park     Tel: +44-(0)1223-353033
*  Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK           Fax: +44-(0)1223-366889
*--------------------------------------------------------------
* BUSTER Development Group      (http://www.globalphasing.com)
***************************************************************