[sharp-discuss] Rcullis(anomalous) for SAD data?
Edward MITCHELL
mitchell@esrf.fr
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:22:45 +0100
Dear Sharpers,
Question: what is the definition of Rcullis(anomalous) for single
wavelength
anomalous data used on it's own with no native data (i.e. "SAD"/"SAS")?
The mmcif defintions at Rutgers give:
sum| |Fph+~obs~Fph-~obs~ - Fh+~calc~ - Fh-~calc~| |
R~cullis,ano~ = ---------------------------------------------------
sum|Fph+~obs~ - Fph-~obs~|
Fph+~obs~ = the observed positive Friedel structure factor
amplitude for the derivative
Fph-~obs~ = the observed negative Friedel structure factor
amplitude for the derivative
Fh+~calc~ = the calculated positive Friedel structure factor
amplitude from the heavy atom model
Fh-~calc~ = the calculated negative Friedel structure factor
amplitude from the heavy atom model
If I try and write this more cleanly:
Rcullis(anom) = E | Fph+(obs)Fph-(obs) - Fh+(calc) -
Fh-(calc) | / E | Fph+(obs) - Fph-(obs) |
But by analogy with the normal Rcullis:
Rcullis = E | | Fph(obs) + Fp(obs) | - | Fh(calc)| | / E |
Fph(obs) - Fp(obs) |
Rcullis(anom) surely should be:
Rcullis(anom) = E | | Fph+(obs) + Fph-(obs) | - | Fh+(calc)
- Fh-(calc) | | / E | Fph+(obs) - Fph-(obs) |
Which (if any) is correct (i.e. what SHARP uses in it's calculations)?
thanks in advance!
Ed.
(the same question then applies to Phasing Power of course!)