[sharp-discuss] sharp-discuss Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3

Thomas Krey tkrey at pasteur.fr
Fri May 31 20:34:43 CEST 2013


On May 31, 2013, at 12:00 PM, sharp-discuss-request at globalphasing.com wrote:

> Send sharp-discuss mailing list submissions to
> 	sharp-discuss at globalphasing.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.globalphasing.com/mailman/listinfo/sharp-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	sharp-discuss-request at globalphasing.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	sharp-discuss-owner at globalphasing.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sharp-discuss digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Problem with residual map analysis (Claus Flensburg)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:17:00 +0100
> From: Claus Flensburg <claus at globalphasing.com>
> Subject: Re: [sharp-discuss] Problem with residual map analysis
> To: Thomas Krey <tkrey at pasteur.fr>
> Cc: sharp-discuss at globalphasing.com
> Message-ID: <20130530131700.GA9528 at leibniz.globalphasing.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 

Dear Claus,

> Dear Thomas,
> 
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Thomas Krey wrote:
>> Dear Claus,
>> 
>> thanks for the answer ! 
>> Just to make sure that I understand this correctly - does that mean
>> that with this particular space group (P1) and unit cell I will not be
>> able to use Sharp at all, because I will run in the same error over
>> and over again ?    
> 
> no, not necessarily. You can be unlucky to have peaks 'just' in the
> wrong place wrt. grids, so ...
> 
>> And my second question seems to be obvious - is there any way to get around that problem ?
> 
> ... do try with a different resolution cutoff. That will change the
> grids and possibly also the location of peaks slightly so the problem
> does not show up.
> 
> Does changing the resolution by 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 make it run?
> 

no, unfortunately the resolution cut does not really seem to play a role - I tried at least 6-8 different cuts and I get consistently the same error.
Is there anything else I could do ?

All the best
Thomas



> 
> With best wishes,
> 
> ClAuS & Clemens (for sharp-develop)
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sharp-discuss mailing list
> sharp-discuss at globalphasing.com
> https://www.globalphasing.com/mailman/listinfo/sharp-discuss
> 
> End of sharp-discuss Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3
> ********************************************

Dr. Thomas Krey
Institut Pasteur
Structural Virology Unit
25-28 Rue du Docteur Roux
75015 Paris
France
tkrey at pasteur.fr





More information about the sharp-discuss mailing list