[buster-discuss] Coot not displaying disulfide bonds after buster refinement
Donald Damian Raymond
donal at umich.edu
Sat Nov 29 14:53:34 CET 2014
Hi Buster developers,
Thanks for the reply. I’ve done some more investigations and it appears to be a bug in coot.
Since I’m working with multiple chains I tend to set “color by chain” in coot. This causes a bug where SSBONDS are not drawn.
Thanks again,
Donald
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 1:04 PM, vonrhein at globalphasing.com wrote:
>
> Dear Donald,
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:59:12AM -0400, Donald Damian Raymond wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been having this issues for some time now and cannot seem to
>> figure it out. Whenever, I refine my structure in buster and
>> visualize the result in COOT, the disulfide bonds are not
>> displayed. However, if I refine the structure in refmac or phenix,
>> the S--S show up just fine in COOT.
>>
>> Buster records for SSBOND below
>>
>> SSBOND 1 CYS A 43 CYS A 276 1555 1555 2.04
>
> which follows the PDB format as described in
>
> http://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/format33/sect6.html#SSBOND
>
> and
>
> http://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/format33/sect1.html#Field
>
> Eg:
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
> SSBOND 1 CYS A 43 CYS A 276 1555 1555 2.04
>
>> SSBOND 2 CYS A 56 CYS A 68 1555 1555 2.03
>> SSBOND 3 CYS A 91 CYS A 137 1555 1555 2.02
>> SSBOND 4 CYS A 280 CYS A 304 1555 1555 2.04
> [... snip ...]
>> SSBOND 16 CYS L 135 CYS L 195 1555 1555 2.04
>>
>> Refmac records for SSBONDS below
>>
>> SSBOND 1 CYS A 43 CYS A 276
>
> which doesn't exactly follow the documentated standard - although the
> missing SymOP and Length fields might be ignored by Coot anyway.
>
>> SSBOND 2 CYS A 56 CYS A 68
>> SSBOND 3 CYS A 91 CYS A 137
>> SSBOND 4 CYS A 137 CYS A 91
>
> Why is the same SS-bond duplicated here? First as A91-A137 and then as
> A137-A91?
>
>> SSBOND 5 CYS A 276 CYS A 43
>> SSBOND 6 CYS A 280 CYS A 304
> [... snip ...]
>> SSBOND 16 CYS D 135 CYS D 195
>>
>> Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Are you running the latest version of Coot? You might need to ask the
> Coot developers for more details or help.
>
> Cheers
>
> Clemens, Claus & Gerard (for BUSTER developers)
More information about the buster-discuss
mailing list