[buster-discuss] R-value 0.000 in output coordinates in BUSTER 2.10.3
ClAuS Flensburg
claus at globalphasing.com
Sat Nov 23 13:15:09 CET 2019
Dear Wolfram,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 08:32:17PM -0500, wtempel wrote:
> Hi,
> after a refinement run that appeared to complete normally, I noticed:
>
> <pdb-header>
> REMARK 3 DATA USED IN REFINEMENT.
> REMARK 3 RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH (ANGSTROMS) : 2.70
> REMARK 3 RESOLUTION RANGE LOW (ANGSTROMS) : 44.65
> REMARK 3 DATA CUTOFF (SIGMA(F)) : 0.000
> REMARK 3 COMPLETENESS FOR RANGE (%) : 99.9
> REMARK 3 NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS : 9823
> REMARK 3
> REMARK 3 FIT TO DATA USED IN REFINEMENT.
> REMARK 3 CROSS-VALIDATION METHOD : THROUGHOUT
> REMARK 3 FREE R VALUE TEST SET SELECTION : RANDOM
> REMARK 3 R VALUE (WORKING + TEST SET) : 0.000
> REMARK 3 R VALUE (WORKING SET) : 0.000
> REMARK 3 FREE R VALUE : 0.000
> REMARK 3 FREE R VALUE TEST SET SIZE (%) : 6.850
> REMARK 3 FREE R VALUE TEST SET COUNT : 673
> REMARK 3 ESTIMATED ERROR OF FREE R VALUE : NULL
> </pdb-header>
>
> I have not noticed this problem even with this BUSTER version, but have not
> run this BUSTER version on this project. The free set has been selected in
> thin shells, and there is a chance that some resolution bins do not have
> any free reflections. R-values have been reported in stdout and at line 15
> of the output PDB file:
>
> REMARK best refinement for F_xds,SIGF_xds with R/Rfree 0.2353/0.2622
>
> Which files should I inspect as I search for the cause?
please locate the file .../01-BUSTER/Cycle-5/rvalue.fx or run:
% rvalue refine.mtz
Does that also compute all zeros?
Regards,
ClAuS & Gerard (for BUSTER Developers)
More information about the buster-discuss
mailing list